hugo is nice - but it's huge. I've never built a static site generator before
and thought the world could use one more - it's not like there's already enough
choice out there!
No, but seriously. I love hugo and it has all the bells and whistles and you
should definitely use that and not this. I just like reinventing the wheel to
learn about stuff - and I like the 80/20 rule. This gives like 60% of what I
want already and is tiny fraction of hugo in terms of LOC (hugo without it's
bazillion dependencies is like 80k+ - this is like 500 and very likely won't
ever grow above let's say 5k).
Also org mode is awesome and why not use it as a configuration format as
well. Let's see where this goes. YOLO.
- Footnotes separator rather than headline to get around i18n
- Warn on footnote redefinition
- Do not export footnote definitions at point of definition, only in the
footnote section.
- Do not automatically exclude Footnotes section to get around possibly hiding
other content of such a section - and i18n.
The user has the choice of explicitly hiding the section via a :noexport:
tag.
and some other refactoring
Until now we expected the .org file to print back to itself - we can't do that
when the input is not pretty printed already - with the introduction of blocks
with unindented content that will be the case.
2018-12-18 23:54:04 +01:00
Renamed from etc/generate-html-fixtures (Browse further)
