ruff: attempt to enable ARG checks, suppress in some places
This commit is contained in:
parent
72cc8ff3ac
commit
985c0f94e6
4 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ if typing.TYPE_CHECKING or under_pytest:
|
|||
parametrize = pytest.mark.parametrize
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
||||
def parametrize(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
def parametrize(*_args, **_kwargs):
|
||||
def wrapper(f):
|
||||
return f
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ def test_ensure_unique() -> None:
|
|||
list(it)
|
||||
|
||||
# hacky way to force distinct objects?
|
||||
list(ensure_unique(dups, key=lambda i: object()))
|
||||
list(ensure_unique(dups, key=lambda _: object()))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def make_dict(
|
||||
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def _listify(func: Callable[LFP, Iterable[LV]], *args: LFP.args, **kwargs: LFP.k
|
|||
# so seems easiest to just use specialize instantiations of decorator instead
|
||||
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
||||
|
||||
def listify(func: Callable[LFP, Iterable[LV]]) -> Callable[LFP, List[LV]]: ...
|
||||
def listify(func: Callable[LFP, Iterable[LV]]) -> Callable[LFP, List[LV]]: ... # noqa: ARG001
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
listify = _listify
|
||||
|
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ def _warn_if_empty(func, *args, **kwargs):
|
|||
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
||||
FF = TypeVar('FF', bound=Callable[..., Iterable])
|
||||
|
||||
def warn_if_empty(f: FF) -> FF: ...
|
||||
def warn_if_empty(func: FF) -> FF: ... # noqa: ARG001
|
||||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
warn_if_empty = _warn_if_empty
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ class config(Protocol):
|
|||
def paths(self) -> Paths:
|
||||
return () # allowed to be empty for 'filelist' logic
|
||||
|
||||
def is_ignored(self, p: Path) -> bool:
|
||||
def is_ignored(self, p: Path) -> bool: # noqa: ARG002
|
||||
"""
|
||||
You can override this in user config if you want to ignore some files that are tooheavy
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ lint.extend-select = [
|
|||
"PLR", # 'refactor' rules
|
||||
"B", # 'bugbear' set -- various possible bugs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# "FA", # TODO enable later after we make sure cachew works?
|
||||
# "ARG", # TODO useful, but results in some false positives in pytest fixtures... maybe later
|
||||
# "S", # bandit (security checks) -- tends to be not very useful, lots of nitpicks
|
||||
# "DTZ", # datetimes checks -- complaining about missing tz and mostly false positives
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue